en · de · es · fr · pt
cjc-1295-notes.peptides4962.com › Info › Cjc-1295 Structure And Mechanism — Background and Details

Cjc-1295 Structure And Mechanism — Background and Details

By Editorial Desk · published 2025-10-01 · last reviewed 2025-10-19 · Info

This is a working overview of freeze-thaw, written for readers who want more than a one-paragraph summary but less than a textbook.

Reviewed 2025-10-19. Anything still debated is marked as such rather than presented as settled.

CJC-1295 Structure And Mechanism

CJC-1295 is a synthetic analogue of growth hormone-releasing hormone, built on the 29-amino-acid GHRH(1-29) fragment. Four substitutions distinguish it from the natural sequence: D-alanine at position 2, glutamine at position 8, alanine at position 15, and leucine at position 27. These changes reduce enzymatic cleavage and extend the peptide's persistence in circulation. The compound is discussed in two forms, one carrying a drug affinity complex and one without it.

The drug affinity complex is a maleimidopropionic acid group attached to a lysine side chain. It reacts with the free thiol of cysteine-34 on circulating albumin, forming a covalent bond. This conjugation keeps the peptide in the bloodstream and shields it from rapid renal filtration and proteolysis. Reported circulation half-lives for the albumin-bound form fall in the range of roughly six to nine days in early human studies.

Handling, Stability and Analysis

Identity and purity are assessed mainly by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometry. The chromatographic separation resolves the target peptide from truncation products and from species carrying oxidised residues, while mass measurement confirms the expected molecular mass. Because the two common variants differ by roughly 280 daltons, a mass determination distinguishes them unambiguously. Purity is often quoted as a percentage of total peak area, although that figure depends on the detection wavelength and the integration method applied.

Reported half-lives differ widely between the two variants and between species. Values for the albumin-binding form are usually expressed in days, while the unconjugated form is measured in minutes to a few hours. Sampling schedules, assay sensitivity, and route of administration all influence the numbers, which limits direct comparison across studies. Whether sustained receptor occupancy produces different downstream effects from pulsatile stimulation remains an open question in the published work. Claims about relative potency should therefore be read alongside the specific study design that produced them.

Cjc-1295 at a glance

PropertyValueNotes
Physical formLyophilized white powderSupplied as a freeze-dried solid for research use
Molecular weightApproximately 3,647 Da (DAC form)Lower for the variant lacking the albumin-binding moiety
SolubilitySoluble in water and aqueous bufferTypically dissolved in sterile or bacteriostatic water
Typical storage temperature−20 °C or belowDry powder, desiccated and protected from light
Common analytical methodReversed-phase HPLC with mass spectrometryUsed for purity estimation and identity confirmation

Molecular Background and Naming

The peptide backbone includes a D-alanine at position two, which resists cleavage by dipeptidyl peptidase IV, and several other substitutions that reduce degradation. Its molecular weight is roughly 3.4 kDa without the linker and about 3.6 kDa with it. The molecule is water soluble and is normally supplied as a lyophilized powder. Precise sequence and mass values depend on which variant is described, so technical documents usually state the exact form being referenced.

CJC-1295 is a synthetic peptide designed as a long-acting analogue of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH). Its structure derives from the first 29 amino acids of native GHRH, a fragment often called GRF(1-29). Four substitutions were introduced to slow enzymatic breakdown and extend activity relative to the natural sequence. The compound was developed by ConjuChem as part of a broader effort to improve the pharmacokinetic profile of peptide hormones. It is studied in laboratory and clinical research settings rather than appearing as a naturally occurring substance.

Two related forms circulate in technical discussion under the same family name. The original version carries a drug affinity complex (DAC) that binds covalently to serum albumin after administration, and this linkage substantially extends circulation time. A second form, frequently written as modified GRF(1-29) or CJC-1295 without DAC, lacks that linker and clears much faster. The naming is a frequent source of confusion because the shorthand CJC-1295 can refer to either form depending on the source. Reports sometimes fail to specify which variant was studied.

Related pages on this site

Background and Molecular Design

CJC-1295 belongs to a family of synthetic peptides modeled on growth hormone-releasing hormone, the hypothalamic signal that prompts the pituitary to release growth hormone. The compound is built from the first twenty-nine amino acids of the natural human sequence, a fragment that retains full receptor binding capacity. Native growth hormone-releasing hormone is degraded quickly in circulation, so the fragment alone has limited practical value. Early work therefore focused on chemical modifications that preserve receptor binding while slowing enzymatic breakdown. The result is a molecule described in the literature as a long-acting analog of the natural hormone.

Two forms circulate under the CJC-1295 name, and they differ by a single appended group. The version without a drug affinity complex carries four substitutions along the peptide chain, including a D-alanine near the amino terminus and replacements at three other positions. These changes block the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase IV and remove a methionine residue that is prone to oxidation. The modified fragment is frequently labeled MOD GRF 1-29. Naming conventions are inconsistent across informal sources, which is a common source of confusion.

Further detail

=== Personal motto === "With united forces" (as the Emperor of Austria) – German: "Mit vereinten Kräften" – Latin: "Viribus Unitis" "My trust in [the ancient] virtue" (as the Apostolic King of Hungary) – Hungarian: "Bizalmam az Ősi Erényben" – Latin: "Virtutis Confido"

==== MeSH D12.776.964.950.800 – trans-activators ==== MeSH D12.776.964.950.800.385 – gene products, rev (HIV) MeSH D12.776.964.950.800.400 – gene products, tat MeSH D12.776.964.950.800.410 – gene products, tax MeSH D12.776.964.950.800.430 – gene products, vpr MeSH D12.776.964.950.800.445 – herpes simplex virus protein vmw65

=== Muscle rigidity === If high boluses of fentanyl are administered quickly, muscle rigidity of the vocal cords can make bag-mask ventilation difficult. The exact mechanism of this effect is unknown, but it can be prevented and treated using neuromuscular blockers.

Male - 50.7% Female - 49.3% Native American/Alaskan - 0.1% Asian/Pacific islander - 0.9% Black - 0.3% Hispanic - 96.1% White - 2.4% Multiracial - 0.2% Additionally, 86.3% of the students were eligible for free or reduced lunch.

Sources: en.wikipedia.org

Background from the literature

Temozolomide, sold under the brand name Temodar among others, is an anticancer medication used to treat brain tumors such as glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma. It is taken by mouth or via intravenous infusion. The most common side effects with temozolomide are nausea, vomiting, constipation, loss of appetite, alopecia (hair loss), headache, fatigue, convulsions (seizures), rash, neutropenia or lymphopenia (low white-blood-cell counts), and thrombocytopenia (low blood platelet counts). People receiving the solution for infusion may also have injection-site reactions, such as pain, irritation, itching, warmth, swelling and redness, as well as bruising. Temozolomide is an alkylating agent used to treat serious brain cancers; most commonly as second-line treatments for astrocytoma and as the first-line treatment for glioblastoma. Olaparib in combination with temozolomide demonstrated substantial clinical activity in relapsed small cell lung cancer. It is available as a generic medication.

=== Function === Mitochondrial fatty acid synthesis plays a crucial role in cellular energy metabolism by generating octanoyl‑ACP (C8), which serves as the direct precursor for lipoic acid biosynthesis. Lipoic acid is an essential cofactor covalently attached to specific lysine residues on target enzymes in a process called lipoylation. This post‑translational modification is essential for the activity of key mitochondrial enzyme complexes—namely, the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC), the α‑ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complex (OGDC), the 2-oxoadipate dehydrogenase complex (2‑OADHC), the branched‑chain α‑ketoacid dehydrogenase complex (BCKDC), and the glycine cleavage system (GCS). In parallel, mtFAS and its acyl‑ACP products provide a metabolic feedback mechanism, regulating mitochondrial acetyl‑CoA consumption and thereby integrating lipid synthesis with broader metabolic control. Beyond octanoyl‑ACP, mtFAS also produces longer‑chain acyl‑ACP species such as myristoyl‑ACP (C14) and palmitoyl‑ACP (C16), which interact with members of the leucine‑tyrosine‑arginine motif (LYRM) protein family. These LYRM proteins are vital for the correct assembly and stability of the electron‑transport chain (ETC) complexes and for iron–sulfur (Fe–S) cluster biogenesis within mitochondria. In addition to these enzymatic and structural roles, mtFAS has also been implicated as a mediator of intracellular signal transduction. This is supported by observations that the levels of bioactive lipids—such as lysophospholipids and sphingolipids—correlate with mtFAS activity.

ISO 2171: Cereals, pulses and by-products — Determination of ash yield by incineration; ISO 3593: Starch — Determination of ash; ISO 928: Spices and condiments - Determination of total ash; and ISO 936: Meat and meat products - Determination of total ash. Examples of ash content methods for the determination of ash in other solids include

== Production == Cortisone is one of several end-products of a process called steroidogenesis. This process starts with the synthesis of cholesterol, which then proceeds through a series of modifications in the adrenal gland to become any one of many steroid hormones. One end-product of this pathway is cortisol. For cortisol to be released from the adrenal gland, a cascade of signaling occurs. Corticotropin-releasing hormone released from the hypothalamus stimulates corticotrophs in the anterior pituitary to release ACTH, which relays the signal to the adrenal cortex. Here, the zona fasciculata and zona reticularis, in response to ACTH, secrete glucocorticoids, in particular cortisol. In various peripheral tissues, notably the kidneys, cortisol is inactivated to cortisone by the enzyme corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 2. This is crucial because cortisol is a potent mineralocorticoid and would cause havoc with electrolyte levels (raising blood sodium and lowering blood potassium levels) and raise blood pressure if it were not inactivated in the kidneys. Because cortisone must be converted to cortisol before being active as a glucocorticoid, its activity is less than simply administering cortisol directly (80–90%).

desolvation – enthalpic penalty for removing the ligand from solvent motion – entropic penalty for reducing the degrees of freedom when a ligand binds to its receptor configuration – conformational strain energy required to put the ligand in its "active" conformation interaction – enthalpic gain for "resolvating" the ligand with its receptor The basic idea is that the overall binding free energy can be decomposed into independent components that are known to be important for the binding process. Each component reflects a certain kind of free energy alteration during the binding process between a ligand and its target receptor. The Master Equation is the linear combination of these components. According to Gibbs free energy equation, the relation between dissociation equilibrium constant, Kd, and the components of free energy was built. Various computational methods are used to estimate each of the components of the master equation. For example, the change in polar surface area upon ligand binding can be used to estimate the desolvation energy. The number of rotatable bonds frozen upon ligand binding is proportional to the motion term. The configurational or strain energy can be estimated using molecular mechanics calculations. Finally the interaction energy can be estimated using methods such as the change in non polar surface, statistically derived potentials of mean force, the number of hydrogen bonds formed, etc. In practice, the components of the master equation are fit to experimental data using multiple linear regression.

Sources: en.wikipedia.org

Further detail

Eigen et al. and Woese proposed that the genomes of early protocells were composed of single-stranded RNA, and that individual genes corresponded to separate RNA segments, rather than being linked end-to-end as in present-day DNA genomes. A protocell that was haploid (one copy of each RNA gene) would be vulnerable to damage, since a single lesion in any RNA segment would be potentially lethal to the protocell (e.g., by blocking replication or inhibiting the function of an essential gene). Vulnerability to damage could be reduced by maintaining two or more copies of each RNA segment in each protocell, i.e., by maintaining diploidy or polyploidy. Genome redundancy would allow a damaged RNA segment to be replaced by an additional replication of its homolog. However, for such a simple organism, the proportion of available resources tied up in the genetic material would be a large fraction of the total resource budget. Under limited resource conditions, the protocell reproductive rate would likely be inversely related to ploidy number. The protocell's fitness would be reduced by the costs of redundancy. Consequently, coping with damaged RNA genes while minimizing the costs of redundancy would likely have been a fundamental problem for early protocells. A cost-benefit analysis was carried out in which the costs of maintaining redundancy were balanced against the costs of genome damage.

=== Analogues === The closely related medication, methylnaltrexone (N-methylnaltrexone), is used to treat opioid-induced constipation but does not treat addiction as it does not cross the blood–brain barrier. Nalmefene (6-desoxy-6-methylenenaltrexone) is similar to naltrexone and is used for the same purposes as naltrexone. Naltrexone should not be confused with naloxone (N-allylnoroxymorphone), which is used in emergency cases of opioid overdose. Other opioid antagonists related to naltrexone include 6β-naltrexol (6β-hydroxynaltrexone), samidorphan (3-carboxamido-4-hydroxynaltrexone), β-funaltrexamine (naltrexone fumarate methyl ester), nalodeine (N-allylnorcodeine), nalorphine (N-allylnormorphine), and nalbuphine (N-cyclobutylmethyl-14-hydroxydihydronormorphine).

=== Mammalian === BCATs in mammals catalyze the first step in branched-chain amino acid metabolism, a reversible transamination followed by the oxidative decarboxylation of the transamination products α-ketoisocaproate, α-keto-β-methylvalerate, and α-ketoisovalerate to isovaleryl-CoA, 3-methylbutyryl-CoA, and isobutyryl-CoA, respectively. This reaction regulates metabolism of amino acids and is a crucial step in nitrogen shuttling throughout the whole body. Branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) are ubiquitous in many organisms, comprising 35% of all proteins and 40% of the amino acids required in all mammals. Mammalian BCATs come in two isoforms: cytosolic (BCATc) and mitochondrial (BCATm). The isoforms share 58% homology, but vary in location and catalytic efficiency.

==== Cognitive and stimulus control ==== Cognitive control and stimulus control, which is associated with operant and classical conditioning, represent opposite processes (i.e., internal vs external or environmental, respectively) that compete over the control of an individual's elicited behaviors. Cognitive control, and particularly inhibitory control over behavior, is impaired in both addiction and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Stimulus-driven behavioral responses (i.e., stimulus control) that are associated with a particular rewarding stimulus tend to dominate one's behavior in an addiction. In operant conditioning, behavior is influenced by outside stimuli, such as a drug. The operant conditioning theory of learning is useful in understanding why the mood-altering or stimulating consequences of drug use can reinforce continued use (an example of positive reinforcement) and why the addicted person seeks to avoid withdrawal through continued use (an example of negative reinforcement). Stimulus control is using the absence of the stimulus or the presence of a reward to influence the resulting behavior. Cognitive control is the intentional selection of thoughts, behaviors and emotions in response to the environment. Drugs alter both the function and the structure of the brain. Cognitive functions such as learning, memory, and impulse control, are affected by drugs. These effects promote drug use, as well as hinder the ability to abstain from it.

Sources: en.wikipedia.org

Frequently asked questions

How does CJC-1295 differ from modified GRF(1-29)?

The two share the same 29-amino-acid backbone. CJC-1295 carries an additional albumin-binding moiety that markedly extends its residence time in circulation, while the form without that moiety clears faster. Literature sometimes applies the name loosely to either variant.

Is CJC-1295 an approved medicine?

It has not been approved by major regulatory agencies for any therapeutic indication. Material sold under this name is typically distributed for laboratory research only. Clinical use is not supported by large controlled trials.

What is known about its half-life?

Early human studies of the albumin-binding form reported circulation half-lives on the order of several days. The value depends on assay method and study design. Estimates for the form without the binding moiety are considerably shorter.

Why is mass spectrometry used alongside chromatography?

Chromatography reports how much material elutes as a single peak but does not confirm what that material is. Mass spectrometry supplies the molecular mass, which is characteristic of a given sequence and its modifications. Together the two methods support both a purity figure and an identity claim.

Network